Skip to content
Welcome To Our Store.
100,000+ Products for Home, Medical, Office & Classroom Needs
Search
Skip to product information
1 of 1

The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism - Paperback

$92.34 USD
$92.34 USD
Sale Sold out
Shipping calculated at checkout.
In stock (100 units), ready to be shipped

Available Offers

Fast delivery available on most orders

Multiple secure payment options accepted

Secure checkout with
  • American Express
  • Apple Pay
  • Diners Club
  • Discover
  • Google Pay
  • Mastercard
  • PayPal
  • Shop Pay
  • Visa

Flight Range: Up to 1,000 meters (3,280 feet)

Maximum Speed: 45 kilometers per hour (28 miles per hour)

For all orders exceeding a value of 100USD shipping is offered for free.

Returns will be accepted for up to 10 days of Customer’s receipt or tracking number on unworn items. You, as a Customer, are obliged to inform us via email before you return the item.

Otherwise, standard shipping charges apply. Check out our delivery Terms & Conditions for more details.

View Product Details
Shopping cart
Product Product subtotal Quantity Price Product subtotal
The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism - Paperback
The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism - Paperback
The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism - Paperback
$92.34/ea
$0.00
$92.34/ea $0.00

Product Description

by Robert Alexy (Author), Stanley Paulson (Author), Bonnie Paulson (Author)

At the heart of this book is the age-old question of how law and morality are related. The legal positivist, insisting on the separation of the two, explicates the concept of law independently of morality. The author challenges this view, arguing that there are, first, conceptually necessary connections between law and morality and, second, normative reasons for including moral elements in the concept of law. While the conceptual argument alone is too limited to establish a sufficiently strong connection between law and morality, and the normative argument alone fails to address the nature of law, the two arguments together support a nonpositivistic concept of law, toppling legal positivism qua comprehensive theory of law.

The author makes his case within a conceptual framework of five distinctions that can be variously combined to represent a multiplicity of presuppositions or perspectives underlying the enquiry into the relationship of law and morality. In this context, it can indeed be shown that there are perspectives that bespeak solely a positivistic concept of law. The decisive point, however, is that there is a perspective, necessary to the law, that necessarily presupposes a nonpositivistic concept of law. This is the perspective of a participant in the legal system, asking for the correct answer to a legal question in this legal system. The participant-thesis is demonstrated by appeal to Gustav Radbruch's formula (extreme injustice is not law) and to the judge's balancing of principles in deciding a concrete case. The author arrives at a concept of law that systematically links classical elements of legal positivism - authoritative issuance and social efficacy - with the desideratum of
nonpositivistic legal theory, correctness of content.

Author Biography


Robert Alexy has been Professor of Public Law and Legal Philosophy at Christian Albrechts University, Kiel, since 1986. He was President of the German Section of the International Association for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy (IVR) from 1994-1998. Other books published by OUP include A Theory of Legal Argumentation and A Theory of Constitutional Rights.

Number of Pages: 160
Dimensions: 0.4 x 8.4 x 5.4 IN
Publication Date: February 22, 2010
you might like