Skip to content
Welcome To Our Store.
100,000+ Products for Home, Medical, Office & Classroom Needs
Search
Skip to product information
1 of 1

The Arbitrage Model of Security Returns: An Empirical Evaluation - Hardcover

$133.92 USD
$133.92 USD
Sale Sold out
Shipping calculated at checkout.
In stock (100 units), ready to be shipped

Available Offers

Fastest Delivery Tomorrow With Vip DealOrder within 1 hr 8 mins.

Instant 10% Discount On HDFC Banks Credit/Debit Cards EMI and CreditCard

Secure checkout with
  • American Express
  • Apple Pay
  • Diners Club
  • Discover
  • Google Pay
  • Mastercard
  • PayPal
  • Shop Pay
  • Visa
  • Daily deals
  • Return policy
  • Payment method
  • Help center 24/7

Flight Range: Up to 1,000 meters (3,280 feet)

Maximum Speed: 45 kilometers per hour (28 miles per hour)

For all orders exceeding a value of 100USD shipping is offered for free.

Returns will be accepted for up to 10 days of Customer’s receipt or tracking number on unworn items. You, as a Customer, are obliged to inform us via email before you return the item.

Otherwise, standard shipping charges apply. Check out our delivery Terms & Conditions for more details.

View Product Details
Shopping cart
Product Product subtotal Quantity Price Product subtotal
The Arbitrage Model of Security Returns: An Empirical Evaluation - Hardcover
The Arbitrage Model of Security Returns: An Empirical Evaluation - Hardcover
The Arbitrage Model of Security Returns: An Empirical Evaluation - Hardcover
$133.92/ea
$0.00
$133.92/ea $0.00

Product Description

by Bradford Jordan (Author)

Abstract:

Over the last two decades, the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) has emerged as the dominant theoretical basis for much of the research in financial economics. Because direct observation of the market portfolio is a pre-requisite for any valid application of the CAPM, it cannot serve as a theoretical basis for empirical research in securities markets. The Arbitrage Pricing Theory (APT) is a theoretical alternative to the CAPM in which the market portfolio plays no particular role.

The purpose of this research is to develop and test a model of the security return generating process based on the APT.

Particular emphasis is placed on two facets of the proposed arbitrage model. First, the central prediction of the APT is an absence of arbitrage opportunities, the empirical identification of which would lead to a rejection of the theory. Thus, the first use to which the model is put is the examination of abnormal performance for the securities individually and jointly. The second application involves an event study comparison of the arbitrage model and a popular variant of the market model. The objective of this comparison is to establish the stability and usefulness of the arbitrage model against a known benchmark.

In light of the growing list of empirical anomalies associated with the market model and the difficulties in application of the CAPM, an empirically tractable and theoretically sound model of security returns would be a significant step forward in financial research.

The data used in the study are daily returns for individual securities from the CRSP file and cover the period 1962 through 1979.

The results indicate substantial support for the APT and the arbitrage model. Significant arbitrage opportunities are found to occur in less than 1% of the individual cases, and the hypothesis of jointly zero abnormal performance cannot be rejected in any case. In the event study comparison, the arbitrage model was found to work at least as well as the market model in all cases and was markedly superior in accounting for the January effect.

Dissertation Discovery Company and University of Florida are dedicated to making scholarly works more discoverable and accessible throughout the world. This dissertation, "The Arbitrage Model of Security Returns" by Bradford Dunson. Jordan, was obtained from University of Florida and is being sold with permission from the author. A digital copy of this work may also be found in the university's institutional repository, IR@UF. The content of this dissertation has not been altered in any way. We have altered the formatting in order to facilitate the ease of printing and reading of the dissertation.
Number of Pages: 154
Dimensions: 0.44 x 11 x 8.5 IN
Publication Date: September 26, 2019
you might like