Product Description
by Milos Jenicek (Author)
Mastery of quality health care and patient safety begins as soon as we open the hospital doors for the first time and start acquiring practical experience. The acquisition of such experience includes much more than the development of sensorimotor skills and basic knowledge of sciences. It relies on effective reason, decision making, and communication shared by all health professionals, including physicians, nurses, dentists, pharmacists, and administrators.
How to Think in Medicine, Reasoning, Decision Making, and Communications in Health Sciences is about these essential skills. It describes how physicians and health professionals reason, make decision, and practice medicine. Covering the basic considerations related to clinical and caregiver reasoning, it lays out a roadmap to help those new to health care as well as seasoned veterans overcome the complexities of working for the well-being of those who trust us with their physical and mental health.
This book provides a step-by-step breakdown of the reasoning process for clinical work and clinical care. It examines both the general and medical ways of thinking, reasoning, argumentation, fact finding, and using evidence. It explores the principles of formal logic as applied to clinical problems and the use of evidence in logical reasoning. In addition to outline the fundamentals of decision making, it integrates coverage of clinical reasoning risk assessment, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis in evidence-based medicine.
Presented in four sections, this book discusses the history and position of the problem and the challenge of medical thinking; provides the philosophy interfacing topics of interest for health sciences professionals including the probabilities, uncertainties, risks, and other quantifications in health by steps of clinical work; decision making in clinical and community health care, research, and practice; Communication in clinical and community care including how to write medical articles, clinical case studies and case reporting, and oral and written communication in clinical and community practice and care.
Author Biography
Milos Jenicek, MD, PhD is Professor of Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Medicine at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. He is also Professor Emeritus at the Université de Montreal, Adjunct Professor at McGill University and Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada. In 2009, he was elected Fellow of the Royal Society of Medicine, London, UK.
He contributes to the evolution of epidemiology as a general method of objective reasoning and decision making in medicine. To further enhance his teaching and research, he has committed himself to short sabbaticals during which he visited Harvard and John Hopkins, Yale, North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Uniformed Services at Bethesda Universities. He also lectured and visited numerous institutions in Hong Kong, Singapore, Japan, South Korea, Portugal, Brazil, France, Switzerland, Morocco, Czech Republic, Singapore and Kuwait. Earlier in his career, he spent three years of University teaching and field practice of preventive medicine and public health in North Africa, which has given him valuable insight and understanding of the realities in this part of the world.
Milos Jenicek is a consultant to various national and international public and private bodies, Editorial Consultant for the Journal of Clinical epidemiology and the Case Reports & Clinical Practice Review and honorary editorial board member of Evidence-Based Preventive Medicine. In addition to numerous scientific papers, Dr. Jenicek is the author of twelve books, his most recent Evidence-Based Practice published by AMA Press in 2005, A Physician's Self-Paced Guide to Critical Thinking (2006, AMA Press); Improving Communication and Decision Making in Research and Practice, (AMA Press, 2009) and Medical Error and Harm: Understanding, Prevention and Control (CRC Press, 2009).
Dr. Jenicek's current interests include the development of methodology and applications of logic and critical thinking in health sciences, enhancement of evidence-based medicine and evidence-based public health, health policies, program evaluation, and decision oriented (bedside) clinical research.
