by Conor McHugh (Author), Jonathan Way (Author)
Some of our attitudes are fitting, others unfitting. It seems fitting to admire Mandela, but not Idi Amin, and to believe that the Seine flows through Paris, but not that the Thames does. Fitting attitudes get things right. Conor McHugh and Jonathan Way argue that fittingness is the key to understanding the normative domain--the domain of reasons, obligations, and value. They develop and defend a novel 'fittingness first' approach, on which fittingness is a normatively basic property and all other normative properties depend on fittingness. They show how this approach illuminates central questions in ethics and epistemology.
Author Biography
Conor McHugh, University of Southampton, Jonathan Way, niversity of Southampton
Conor McHugh is Associate Professor in Philosophy at the University of Southampton. He has worked on a range of topics in epistemology, value theory, and philosophy of mind. These include the nature of belief and of attitudes more generally, normativity, reasons and reasoning, mental agency, doxastic non-voluntarism, and self-knowledge. He has published on these topics in leading journals such as
Ethics, Mind, and Philosophy and
Phenomenological Research. He is the co-editor, with Jonathan Way and Daniel Whiting, of
Normativity: Epistemic and Practical (OUP, 2018) and
Metaepistemology (OUP, 2018).
Jonathan Way is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Southampton. He works on a range of topics in ethics and epistemology. He is especially interested in questions about reasons, rationality, value, and normativity, across the epistemic, practical, and affective domains. He has published on these issues in leading journals such as
Ethics,
Mind, and
Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. He is the co-editor, with Conor McHugh and Daniel Whiting, of
Normativity: Epistemic and Practical (OUP, 2018) and
Metaepistemology (OUP, 2018).
Number of Pages: 224
Dimensions: 1.1 x 8.7 x 6.1 IN
Publication Date: January 28, 2023
