The Appearance of Equality: Racial Gerrymandering, Redistricting, and the Supreme Court - Hardcover
Available Offers
Fastest Delivery Tomorrow With Vip DealOrder within 1 hr 8 mins.
Instant 10% Discount On HDFC Banks Credit/Debit Cards EMI and CreditCard
Couldn't load pickup availability
Product Details
Flight Range: Up to 1,000 meters (3,280 feet)
Maximum Speed: 45 kilometers per hour (28 miles per hour)
Shipping And Return
For all orders exceeding a value of 100USD shipping is offered for free.
Returns will be accepted for up to 10 days of Customer’s receipt or tracking number on unworn items. You, as a Customer, are obliged to inform us via email before you return the item.
Otherwise, standard shipping charges apply. Check out our delivery Terms & Conditions for more details.

Product Description
by Christophe M. Burke (Author)
An examination of the language of law in the area of political representation, this book considers the development and recognition of group claims brought pursuant to the Voting Rights Act and the Equal Protection Clause in Supreme Court opinions. In his analysis, Burke highlights the different, discursive strategies, broadly identified as liberal and communitarian, used by the Supreme Court to justify the outcomes of various cases, and he argues that no particular strategy of justification is inherently politically conservative or liberal and that no conception of political representation is unassailable. Therefore, it is unlikely that the Supreme Court will articulate a stable measure of fair representation.
The Supreme Court offers one more forum in the deliberation over what is fair representation; however, it is not likely to provide minority communities with a legal answer to the problem of political underrepresentation. As such, this book tells the uncertain story of the creation of political fairness by the Supreme Court. The language used to characterize what is fair and representative, and the theoretical designs which the rhetoric reflects, allows us to formulate concepts of fair representation as legal standards evolve. By placing the debate over fair representation in not only political and legal but also philosophical terms, we are better able to understand the inevitable tensions that drive the concept of representation into new, ill-defined, and contentious areas.Author Biography
CHRISTOPHER M. BURKE is Assistant Attorney General./e










